The problem of “turnover» of industrial personnel in the late 1940s is essential for studying the choice of the path of development of postwar Soviet society, so its individual aspects have repeatedly attracted the attention of researchers. The purpose of this article is to investigate two variants of proposals to solve the problem of personnel turnover (originating from the USSR Ministry of Labour Reserves and Gosplan). Using comparative-historical and systemic methods, the differences in some approaches to its solution are identified, and it is shown that the fate of the projects was largely determined by the tendencies of situational struggle in the Soviet leadership. The results of the study may be useful in the process of studying history (including the history of vocational education) of the second half of the 1940s.